CPIS, Commercial Investigations LLP
Digital Evidence Verification

Deepfake & AI-Generated Media Detection

Examine disputed images, video and audio for indicators of synthetic generation, manipulation and impersonation.

The Brief

A suspicious image, recording or video rarely exists in isolation. CPIS reviews the media together with its source, metadata and surrounding evidence to provide a measured assessment, not a one-click verdict.

Who this is for

Built for sensitive,
high-stakes situations.

  • 01Businesses responding to executive, employee or brand impersonation
  • 02Law firms and insurers reviewing disputed digital evidence
  • 03HR and compliance teams investigating suspected media manipulation
  • 04Individuals facing scams, harassment, blackmail or reputational harm involving synthetic media
Media examined

More than a detector score.

01

AI-generated images and face manipulation

Review signs associated with synthetic images, face swaps, inpainting, splicing and other forms of digital alteration.

02

Deepfake video and impersonation

Examine visual continuity, lip synchronisation, compression, source history and other indicators relevant to manipulated video.

03

AI voice and audio concerns

Assess available recordings, waveform characteristics, editing indicators and the surrounding communication trail where voice cloning is suspected.

04

Context and source verification

Compare the media with original files, account activity, publication history and other evidence that may support or contradict authenticity.

Methodology

Discreet. Lawful. Evidence-driven.

  1. 01

    Preserve the best available source

    We identify and retain the original or highest-quality file available, document its source and calculate hashes where appropriate.

  2. 02

    Metadata and provenance review

    File properties, editing history, compression and available source information are examined before interpreting detector output.

  3. 03

    Layered media examination

    Relevant visual, audio and contextual indicators are assessed together. No single automated tool is treated as definitive proof.

  4. 04

    Confidence-based reporting

    Findings, methods, limitations and alternative explanations are documented in language suitable for professional review.

Deliverables

Findings with context.

  • 01Schedule of the files and sources examined
  • 02Documented preservation steps and file hashes, where appropriate
  • 03Methodology and relevant authenticity indicators
  • 04Confidence-based findings with limitations and alternative explanations
  • 05Supporting exhibits and a confidential written report
A measured conclusion

Deepfake detection is not always conclusive.

Detection tools can produce false positives and false negatives, particularly when media has been compressed, edited or recorded from another screen. CPIS reports the strength of the available indicators and the limits of the examination rather than promising 100 percent certainty.

Questions, answered.

Speak To An Investigator

When the matter is sensitive, the firm you choose matters most.

Speak directly with a licensed investigator. Free, fully confidential, no obligation, most matters can be assessed in a single call.

Three ways to reach us
Office
197A Thomson Road, Goldhill Centre, Singapore 307635
Response
Same-day for time-sensitive matters. 24 to 48 hours standard.
Discretion
Anonymous intake available. Your enquiry stays private.
Call UsWhatsAppFree Consult